Is the film worth seeing?

There are too many comedic parts and not enough edge-of-your-seat scary parts.

Apparently, there arent that many jump scares or truly terrifying moments throughout the film.

Article image

EW, image credit Marco Grob

And some people are saying there arent nearly enough scenes with Pennywise.

https://twitter.com/TheOtherScottM/status/1163981079709016065

Bill Hader deserves an Emmy for his performance.

You first saw Bill Hader onSNL, but lately hes been taking on more dramatic roles.

January Nelson

Now, hes killing it (no pun intended) as the grownup version of Finn Wolfhards character.

It seems like an odd choice considering the entire first part ofItrevolved around the kids.

We already know their history.

We already know their personalities.

https://twitter.com/arcticninjapaul/status/1163979543998164993

https://twitter.com/WilliamBibbiani/status/1163989916612616192

https://twitter.com/thehorrorchick/status/1163993465882992640

The villain doesnt always make sense.

Its a bit confusing.

https://twitter.com/mikeryan/status/1163980730239787008

Its apretty long film.

Even though there was a part one, part two isnt exactly short and sweet.

This movie lasts for two hours and forty-five minutes.

And unfortunately, some people are saying itfeelslike two hours and forty-five minutes.

https://twitter.com/BrandonDavisBD/status/1164005730111774720

https://twitter.com/DorianParksnRec/status/1164035699336572928

Overall, it captures the Stephen King novel well.

People had super high expectations for this film.

Its natural for some critics to feel disappointed.

That doesnt mean the movie isnt worth watching.

Its still a great take on a classic story.

Its still worth seeing with a bucket of popcorn.

https://twitter.com/cevangelista413/status/1163979130959998978

https://twitter.com/FaithNoMoar/status/1164007208478265345